Friday 29 April 2011

Can You Be Innovative In Housing?

Octavia Hill by John Singer Sargent (source)
Housing is a very simple business. I realise that’s a pretty dangerous statement for the CEO of a Housing Association to make and I would issue a few caveats, but in general my point is that the fundamental business of the housing world hasn’t changed much since the days of Octavia Hill. For anyone new to the business of housing (or anyone who wants a refresher) housing works like this: you build property, you offer those properties to people, you collect rent from those people, you keep the housing stock in good condition, you use the rent to build more houses and do other good things in your community.What could be simpler?

One issue with this is that when your main business is relatively straight-forward there’s the danger that you think you know how its done and miss the opportunities and progress that arises from innovation. I’ve been thinking on this issue more than usual lately as we’re hosting Progress 2011 on May 10th (its already fully booked, but watch the blog for posts afterwards). The theme of the day is “Necessity is the mother of invention” and we’ll be looking at how the current environment with all the associated flux and change is making our “simple” business of housing more complex than its been for years.

There's a mix of viewpoints on this but my feeling is that we have to be positive and identify the benefits and opportunities that arise from any given situation. After all, it’s all too easy to bemoan the difficulties that are created by powers out of our control, but why should we invest energy into complaining about things we can’t change when we can put that energy into making the best of the opportunities that this change is bringing. After all, as the wise t-shirt slogan goes – “When life gives you lemons, keep them because, hey, free lemons!”.

One of the biggest positives you can take out of the current situation is that we can feel the dead hand of regulation being lifted from our shoulders. There is currently a philosophy at the top that believes we should be less restrained by rules and more in touch with our customers. So for the first time in my 30+ years in the sector, there’s a real chance we will be left to get on with running the business that we know, in the way that meets our customers’ needs – that’s got to be a positive. In my experience extra regulation simply increases the need to comply. You end up with a culture that is obsessed with compliance: league tables and pointless trophies that exist just to show that you can follow regulation. Sweep that away and there’s an excitingly blank canvas. Onto that we can project new thoughts, express new ideas, in short we are being encouraged to innovate.

And what happens if we all start being creative and innovative? I was wondering this same thing about housing whilst listening to an excellent recent BBC documentary on pencil manufacturers in Germany who are still, after 200 years, competing to see who can innovate to produce the sharpest lead (honestly, it’s more interesting than that initially sounds! Listen Again on the iPlayer). Well, hopefully we start doing new things, things that are exciting, things that are a bit adventurous, things that are useful, things that are wanted by our customers, things we didn't know were possible. It’s inevitable that we’ll make mistakes, but as long as we acknowledge that they are mistakes, learn from them and move on, that’s ok too.

Then we begin to see a real differentiation between the services we offer to communities, some challenging ideas, some technological leaps forward, perhaps into a culture that really embraces the possibilities of social media. There is ultimately the creation of an industry that Octavia Hill might not recognise if she were alive today. We forget sometimes that as a woman who helped to create the National Trust, protect public land at the expense of private development and provide shelter for the country’s poor, Hill was invested in some fairly dangerous new thinking herself and that’s an attitude towards change, campaigning and innovation we should seek to emulate.

Let me end on a question – what do you do that’s innovative? When was the last time you or your business tried something different? How did it work out?

3 comments:

  1. Matthew, I'd like to ask that question of the Trust.

    What does it do that is innovative for customers? When was the last time it tried something different?

    I think what Trust customers really want is a level of customer service that you are not providing.

    It takes the Trust far too long to get things done and respond to user needs.

    It seems to be always more interested in PR opportunities than actually providing customers with a level of service that exceeds their expectations.

    'Progress 2011' - is this yet another talking shop?

    The glossy magazine you send out - a great example of one way corporate spin - why not scrap it and try something different?

    Less talk, more action.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Caroline Mawdsley4 May 2011 at 09:05

    I like this post Matthew.
    I like to think C2N Software are innovative. We are new to social media but already we are seeing results; most hits to our site are a direct result of a tweet on twitter.
    We develop bespoke software for the social housing sector. We knew the market was swamped with HM systems, but we felt our ideas for simple solutions were not covered so went ahead and developed them. Our clients tell us that our AiDA software is easy to use, adds value to the adaptations service, produces measurable results and has become integral to their business. We strongly believe that organisations should not adapt their business to suit their software, but adapt their software to suit their business.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks Caroline and Jessica, by the way, I think you're right that it's always worth asking the same questions of your own organisation.

    At THT we always seek to innovate where possible and when appropriate. Some of the things we've instituted over the last few years include choice-based lettings, developing extra care homes for older residents and the CleanStart programme to provide prolific offenders with a chance of a new start in a job.

    Granted there have been some things we've tried, like opening on Saturday mornings for phone calls which didn't work, so we've acknowledged that, taken the bits that did work (like the Saturday morning repairs) and moved on.

    The point about PR is interesting in that I think it's certainly important to look to make these innovations for the sake of customers rather than because they look or sound good - and that's certainly something we'll keep trying to do.

    ReplyDelete